CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Technique

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Technique
From: <w9wi@w9wi.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 08:22:35 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 11:27:58 -0500 (CDT)
  Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net> wrote:
> But at what point do you "lose" the frequency when you 
>jump to the other rig?

IMHO, as soon as someone asks "QRL?" and you fail to 
reply.

> Either way, consider the poor slob who THINKS he's found 
>a clear frequency, QRL'd with no response, has begun 
>CQ'ing and even worked a few stations.  Is it now 
>reasonable or fair to him that you suddenly pop back on 
>frequency after the short absence, and demand that HE 
>leave so that you can have your run frequency back? 
> Worse, after he reasonably states something to the 
>effect that you were gone, and no one replied to his QRL? 
>-- should you now try to push him off frequency by 
>overpowering or QRM'ing him, just because you can? 

I have seen that tried, and I believe that too is 
cheating.

==
Doug Smith W9WI
Pleasant View, TN EM66
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>