CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] I shouldnt be complaining but..

To: W4ZW <w4zw@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] I shouldnt be complaining but..
From: lew <lew@dsl-only.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 13:07:57 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
W4ZW wrote:

>Guess I'm an OOTC, too.
>EGREGIOUS has always meant distinguished or eminent to me.  Guess all that
>"egregious" Latin in my teen years is too blame.
>
>  
>
>>>     Lew   W7EW/W7AT
>>>     Primary Plaquester for The Boring Amateur Radio Club
>>>      
>>>
>>Lew--
>>EGREGIOUS in what way?  Or are you using the ARCHAIC meaning of the
>>word?         Didn't realize you were that old, Lew.
>>Gee, I hope to live to be archaic too!     ;-)
>>As Always, John  W0UN
>>
>>EGREGIOUS
>>1.  Extraordinary is some BAD way; glaring; flagrant.
>>2.  ARCHAIC. distinguished or eminent.
>>    
>>
> 
>
       Gentlemen/Ladies/Others,
           Not to vitiate Brother Brosnahan's point, but my use of the 
language is apparently archaic, as I was schooled appropriately.  My 
physical/mental functioning is not archaic however.  I've been confined 
to the narthex of contesting  but am working on a cunning plan to return 
to the contesting sudatorium with better frequency.
     73 and I remain,
      Lew    W7EW/W7AT
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>