CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB Sections in SS

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB Sections in SS
From: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>
Reply-to: vo1he@rac.ca
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 01:48:36 -0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
For me, the "correct" phonetics are always easy to copy. It's the
"personalized" ones that can also throw you off. If I use "Very Old One Has
Everything" I'll have to repeat it a million times.

Everyone.... please stick the the standard phonetics all should be OK.


73 -- Paul VO1HE  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com 
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Art Boyars
> Sent: October 18, 2006 13:30
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] SSB Sections in SS
> 
> VO1MX and VE3DZ mentioned that poor enunciation makes it hard 
> to copy your Section -- especially if the receiving op is not 
> familiar with the the info.  This brings me back to my Little 
> Pistol question -- on SSB (especially if the signal is weak) 
> which way is easier for the receiving op to copy: 
> "Maaarylaand" or "Mike Delta (Charlie)"; or "Losss Aangeless" 
> or "Lima Alfa Xray"?
> 
> I would think that the phonetics are more clear, and that 
> they take one less translation step from ear to keyboard.  
> But I'd like to hear what the "real" phone op's think.
> 
> 73, Art K3KU
> "Tune for maximum fun"
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>