It could be very interesting. Same station, different ops/calls, diffeent
times... a comparison between the two logs would really come down to
propagation and operator skill since the equipment available would be
otherwise equal.
However, if I'm not mistaken, many if not most major contests disallow this
in principle, with the exception of a single station that is assigned more
than one call (such as a family station -- husband/wife, parent/child,
etc.). So if you were to do this in a major contest, you couldn't send in
an entry unless you were given a waiver for the purposes of the experiment.
Hope you enjoyed CQ WW CW. What little operating time I had, I did! Picked
up a few new ones and filled in a few bands for some entities... really need
to get a 160 antenna up somehow, though...
73, ron w3wn
CQ WW 06 single operator, packet monitoring, packet contributing,
eavesdropping on who the big guns worked when applicable, and not giving
a... hoot about category because I didn't work enough to bother sending in a
log anyway... ok, maybe a check log...
-----Original Message-----
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 23:58:34 EST
From: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Two callsign, two op, single station
To: CQ-Contest@contesting.com
It occurred to me during CQWW CW this weekend that the contest could be
very
exciting if two operators shared one station with two callsigns. I'm
talking about taking one or two hour shifts during the prime hours, and
perhaps a
longer shift during the wee hours of the morning and the high-absorption
mid-day hours, with alternating callsigns and comparing scores at the end
of the
contest.
Seems like it might break up the 48 hours a bit and maybe even allow some
rest for our aging contest population. Although it might be a crap shoot
as
far as good vs. bad hours and conditions, it might also address that "level
playing field" issue.
Thoughts?
Paul, K5AF
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|