[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] The Unassisted Myth - Now the Rest of the Story:The Ass

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] The Unassisted Myth - Now the Rest of the Story:The Assisted Myth (?)
From: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Reply-to: n2ic@arrl.net
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:21:09 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
k3bu@optonline.net wrote:

> How would having at least 1 point per domestic QSO change that? Let me look
> into the crystal ball: Opprotunity to work some 2000 stations more, work some
> stuff when bands are dead to other directions, more points, more fun, more
> participation, busy low bands at night, chance to get into world top
> listings. Me thinks, it would benefit everyone. I am suprised that you
> mid-to-westerners are not screaming for that change, but keep harping on
> easterners.

I'm okay with the current CQWW rules. The WPX and IARU contests provide ample 
opportunities to work USA and DX, and rewarding DX QSO's with higher point 

73, MX and HNY,
Steve, N2IC/5
CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>