| To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet has ruined Ham Radio |
| From: | "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net> |
| Reply-to: | k1ttt@arrl.net |
| Date: | Sat, 23 Dec 2006 11:52:37 -0000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> Don't the rules say something about both callsigns > being sent and received for it to be a valid QSO? No. well, maybe for a few contests, but in general no. In most cases you never have to send the station's call you are working if you are s&p'ing. David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] QSX frequency, David Robbins K1TTT |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ZERO points, David Robbins K1TTT |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet has ruined Ham Radio, Kelly Taylor |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet has ruined Ham Radio, Art Boyars |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |