CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB below 1.843

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB below 1.843
From: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Reply-to: k1ttt@arrl.net
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 11:41:32 -0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
My thought is that the 'dx window' is a mostly out dated artifact from when
many countries had very narrow slivers and only low power on 160m.

And has been noted many times.  Band plans are not law, they are made up for
normal operating conditions and are not meant to handle the large influx of
activity during contests.


David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-
> bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of k8vf_mark@centurytel.net
> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 02:47
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] SSB below 1.843
> 
> Is it common for fellows to be on SSB below 1843?
> I havent noticed it in a while.
> 
> Sure is tough on the 1830-35 DX window.
> 
> What is the thought on this?  I dont see why SSB is necessary below 1843,
> which is the normal band plan.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark
> K8VF
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>