I'm using a Compaq, with a +3400 AMD processor and windows XP Home and not
using any interface for CW or Rig control with N1MM software. I did take
and Old PCI card from my old box with 2 com 1 Lpt and put it into this
mach. Using the same CW/PTT Lpt keying ckt that I used with NA, It also
works with CT and TR. No fancy boxes
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
To: "'Igor Sokolov'" <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>; "'Andy
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 7:36 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CTU Survey Results
>I have used TR quite successfully in a DOS Window on my Win89 SE Machine. I
>keep the old Pentium 350 w/Windows 98 specifically because it sends CW
>without having to buy an expensive external keyer for Writelog and TR and
>so I can use TR if I want to.
> Bill, W5VX
>>From: email@example.com [mailto:cq-contest-
>>firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Igor Sokolov
>>Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 12:50 PM
>>To: email@example.com; Andy Blank
>>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CTU Survey Results
>>Hi Andy and all,
>>May I disagree with some of your statements given in the PDF presentation
>>In Advanced Features you did not mention one very important thing.
>>The unique feature of TRlog as compared to other contest loggers is the
>>possibility for non programmer to adapt TRlog for ANY contest. That means
>>that TRlog users do not have to rely upon someone else when they want to
>>enter one of the contests that are not internally supported by the logger.
>>As for Drawbacks
>>ï Need DOS machine
>>Works just fine on Win98.
>>ï Windows version not likely
>>Although it is the work in progress (though most contest loggers are) here
>>is the link to TR4win
>>http://rescab.nm.ru/ TR4W is based on the original TRlog code.
>>73, Igor UA9CDC
>>> With thanks to those of you who took the time to fill out the survey
>>> results for contest software;
>>> Here is the link to the results of the survey:
>>> Unfortunately the survey was designed to take text based answers. Big
>>> It was very difficult to sort the over 500 responses.
>>> Because of this, I included the raw data spreadsheet. The callsigns
>>> are omitted to maintain anonymity.
>>> You can read the responses and comments directly on the spreadsheet
>>> if you have the patience :-).
>>> The program choice is in Column D, where:
>>> 1= CT
>>> I also included the Contest University (CTU) PDF presentation given in
>>> It was designed as a primer to introduce new programs to beginners
>>> and includes some survey results.
>>> I learned some lessons from this experience including never to make a
>>> text based survey again!
>>> Also, hams are very loyal to their software. Even more so when they
>>> are free :-).
>>> Additionally, the best operators can adapt to any software in short
>>> order. Plus, they use specific packages when they work better for
>>> specific contests.
>>> Thanks for all the responses.
>>> 73, Andy N2NT
>>CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest mailing list
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.14/885 - Release Date: 7/3/2007
CQ-Contest mailing list