CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] cheating with packet

To: "'Yuri VE3DZ'" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cheating with packet
From: "Randy Thompson" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:37:45 -0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Because some of us still like to do things the old fashioned way.  All by
ourselves!  And we like the fact that we can compete in a category with
other people who feel the same way.  Even makes it more fun when we can beat
the packet assisted guys.

I am against combining them because I like to be recognized as a guy who
knows how to operate.

I wouldn't mind if they were combined because then all the SOA guys who
think they are competitive will realize that packet does not a winning score
make.

Randy, K5ZD 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com 
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Yuri VE3DZ
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 7:08 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cheating with packet
> 
> I don't like Dx Cluster, but the reality is - like it or not 
> - almost everyone is using it nowadays, one way or another. I 
> mean 99.9 % of the HAM stations have the capability of using 
> Dx Cluster today.
> So, why not just allow it for all categories, like it was 
> done for WAE or Russian DX long time ago?
> 
> What are we afraid of here?
> 
> 
> Yuri  VE3DZ
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>