> Dpesn't spotting assistance require an internet connection, a modem
> and/or a VHF packet connection? Sounds like hardware to me.
The very same hardware used for computer (assisted) logging that
you don't deem worthy of a separate category. Of course, hypocrisy
in pursuit of your jihad against SO2R doesn't matter as long as you
can segregate "those" SO2R operators from your "pure" single radio
operators.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Bill Turner
> Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 11:33 AM
> To: rtty@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] SO2R-SO1R from The Yukon??
>
>
> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
> On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 11:49:49 -0500, "Joe Subich, W4TV"
> <w4tv@subich.com> wrote:
>
> >Telnet spotting is built into all of the major contest logging
> >software - there is no hardware difference
>
> ------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------
>
> Dpesn't spotting assistance require an internet connection, a modem
> and/or a VHF packet connection? Sounds like hardware to me.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|