CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: Getscores.org Changes/Improvements.

To: David Robbins K1TTT <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: Getscores.org Changes/Improvements.
From: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 08:10:37 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 12:26:36PM +0000, David Robbins K1TTT wrote:
> 
> ah, so you didn't have a plan to effectively monitor 10m, so you are not one
> of those who is really playing to win.  

I think it's disingenuous to suggest that if someone makes a mistake 
when operating a contest that they were not operating to win.  The one time
I've come really close to beating K5TR in a head-to-head unassisted single op 
contest was last year's WPX phone.  On Sunday afternoon, George decided to
try to push 15 meters to get something new out of it while I stayed with 
20 meters.  I got a short opening to Europe (when we hadn't had one all 
weekend) and almost caught up to him because of the new multipliers.  He 
still beat me by a small margin, but I think it's safe to say that we were
both doing our best to maximize our scores - George had the high QSO total 
for W/VE single ops that weekend.  Would the availability of a real-time 
scoreboard have altered our strategy/tactics?  Quite possibly.

-- 
Kenneth E. Harker WM5R
kenharker@kenharker.com
http://www.kenharker.com/

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>