What are you worrying about clusters?
Do single op, not assisted and be happy
73
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Marijan Miletic
Sent: Mittwoch, 5. März 2008 00:05
To: CQ-Contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] "Reverse Beacon" Test using CW Skimmer
N4ZR: It is likely, based on CPU loading considerations, that a real reverse
beacon capability worldwide will depend on development of a web server
capable of handling multiple simultaneous user requests, but this is a first
proof of concept
Pete, I hope you are aware of CQ WW happenings when DX Cluster network
suffers from considerable delays and N1MM Logger becomes very slow. We
might develop strategic Skimmer network similar to NCCC beacons and have
live shorthand of HF CW. I wouldn't call it CT1BOH democracy but increased
noise level burning DX. Hamradio has a very bad trend causing internal QRM
with illegal power, bad cliks, TX wideband noise. Are we all going to
operate on simulated ionosphere?
I am glad and proud K6STI and myself did NOT release CW contest robot in
1991.
73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|