CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] qrp-declaration...

To: <ve4xt@mts.net>, "'DL8MBS'" <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] qrp-declaration...
From: "Jukka Klemola" <jukka.klemola@elisanet.fi>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 21:42:04 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
?
Has someone written /QRP is a good idea?

I wrote people trying to use it will quit using after they realise it is
nothing but a pain in the exchange.


73,
Jukka OH6LI

...
>Hi Chris,
>
>Glad to see I'm not alone in thinking the /qrp is a bad idea!
...
>73, kelly
>ve4xt

...
>> If detecting cheaters by monitoring stations is an aim (a good one I 
>> think) why not better add a power designator to the exchange like H,
L, 
>> Q (RDXA already being a contest with a REAL exchange)? It is only one

>> additional character and sent by EVERY station - not coming out of
the 
>> blue like every 23rd station being qrp and sending something cryptic 
>> with a slash.
>>  
>> I do some QRP-contesting and it would take an armed man in my shack
to 
>> make me send an additional /qrp - if it were allowed in DL and not 
>> making me multi-op ;-)  I´m thankful for every guy on the other end 
>> taking the time for more than one request about call and serial
number. 
>> Should I also torture him with guessing what´s behind the slash? IMHO
NO.
...
> Only my two eurocents.
> 73, Chris


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>