> As for an outright ban, I liken the technology gap
> to a related
> matter of the Pennsylvania Amish (stick with me here
> a minute)
>
> In say 1845, the Amish were not a whole lot
> different technology wise
> than the "English" as they referred to other folks
> here in PA. As
> years went by, as the rest of us adopted more and
> more technology,
> the gap widened, until today, those who practice the
> traditional form
> are completely estranged from the rest of us,
> technology wise.
>
> side note: Many Amish folk here in PA have adopted
> some modern
> technology, some times in unusual ways so as not to
> violate their
> beliefs - but that is a different issue.
Mike, again, I don't see anyone calling for a ban on
the technology, just the appropriate place for it.
Too, assisted should not be looked down upon as a
category. It's not inferior, it's just a different
approach to the sport.
As to the Amish analogy, they are a thriving group of
communities without the technological sea to wade
through. I would ask, what would you rather have: a
piece of Amish Furniture or the latest pressboard
stuff sold at Walmart?
> rare one. I think that the human running the station
> is sacrosanct,
> and I doubt that anyone wants to make such a
> human-less station.
I'll take that bet. What odds are you giving? ;o)
73,
Julius
Julius Fazekas
N2WN
Tennessee Contest Group
TnQP http://www.tnqp.org/
Elecraft K2/100 #3311
Elecraft K2/100 #4455
Elecraft K3/100 #366
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|