CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposal For Single Op and Single Op Assisted

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposal For Single Op and Single Op Assisted
From: "Kostas SV1DPI" <sv1dpi@otenet.gr>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 23:48:56 +0300
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
As a foreign who has some problems with English language i find this 
proposal quite understandable. Because i believe that the majority (all the 
dxers and many of the contesters) uses cluster (even they send their log not 
assisted) and maybe decoding devices i think that the categories must be
Single operator not assisted
and
Single operator
That is the default category must be the assisted.
Kostas sv1dpi

----- Original Message ----- 
>
> Single Op
>
> Operates the amateur radio equipment alone. All reception and transmitting
> is done in accordance with the contest rules and the rules of his/her
> licensing authority. No use of receiving or alerting assistance of any 
> kind
> is allowed including external spotting, arranged schedules, or any 
> decoding
> devices other than natural human capability may be used, except for RTTY,
> where "non-human ear" decoding of incoming signals is allowed if the
> decoding is done within the usual bandpass of the receiver.
>
> Single Operator Assisted
>
> Same as Single Op except the use of receiving or alerting assistance may 
> be
> used including external spotting, as well as decoding devices other than
> natural human capability.
>
> Jim George N3BB
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>