CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer - Proposal & Compromise

To: "Sherman Banks" <w4atl@shermanbanks.net>, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer - Proposal & Compromise
From: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: k-zero-hb@earthlink.net
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 19:48:21 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
> [Original Message]
> From: Sherman Banks <w4atl@shermanbanks.net>
>
> So as I understand it a computer can encode CW but is banned from decoding
> it. Where is the line drawn with calling CQ? If we are consistent, then
the
> computer should be banned from encoding and decoding CW.
>
> Keyers have little computers in them to aid in the sending of CW. They
> should be banned too.
>

If this is one of those "either/or" deals, then I could agree to this
quicker than I could agree to "Skimmer isn't assistance".

73, de Hans, K0HB
--
Observation the morning after the contest: 

  "A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than 
  any invention in human history -- with the possible 
  exception of a quart of tequila and a borrowed 
  Vibroplex key."

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>