CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer - Proposal & Compromise

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer - Proposal & Compromise
From: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Reply-to: k1ttt@arrl.net
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:22:30 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Those who run packet clusters would need to have "trusted sites" and make
> provisions so that Skimmer input was not accepted to avoid this.
>

not going to happen... in fact, some nodes are now offering skimmer spots to
local users.  It won't be long before we get the filters a bit better and
they will be loose in the world wide network and indistinguishable from
operator entered spots, there won't be any way for anyone to know if it was
skimmed or human entered....  this another push to kill the whole packet
network in disguise??


David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
 



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>