To: | <CQ-Contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Redesign Challenge |
From: | "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com> |
Date: | Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:21:20 -0500 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
VK7GN said: > Assitance is an artifact of history ... To persist with > using the word as a major rules segmentation device is > no longer usefull or sensible. Thank you Martin. Well put. This is not a matter of a simple rules adjustment. It goes some layers deeper. Skimmer should be recognized as a shift in fundamentals by participants and sponsors alike. Mark, N5OT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] 2008 AlQP - All 3830 Claimed Scores 12Jun2008, mwdink |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Remove that Word!, Ward Silver |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge, Martin Luther |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge, Joe Subich, W4TV |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |