CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Real World Testing The Packet/Skimmer Score IncreaseHyp

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Real World Testing The Packet/Skimmer Score IncreaseHypothesis
From: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:30:32 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
K1TTT wrote: The big worry seems to be that the use of the skimmer would
upset the apple
cart so badly that perennial winners would get beaten.

I guess N5TJ @ VE3EJ score convinced assisted doubters :-)

NF1J/6 wrote: Amateur radio is ostensibly a "technical" hobby--we would do
better to find ways to
embrace, use, and identify these possibilities (and fit them into the
appropriate categorization) rather than ostriching ourselves and burying our
heads in the ground.

I was told that California helps us seeing the future and I hope it helped
K3EST.  K6STI knew it!

73 de Mario, S56A, N1Yu


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [CQ-Contest] Real World Testing The Packet/Skimmer Score IncreaseHypothesis, Marijan Miletic <=