CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Keying Cable

To: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Keying Cable
From: "Dennis Vernacchia" <n6ki73@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:34:17 -0800
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I have had several transistor types fail over last 13 years

No failures with the Opto type circuits

No keying problems

( W1GEE Opto units )

U got lucky

others mileage may vary

stick with the Opto units

My 2 cents

N6KI

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:08 AM, Art Boyars <art.boyars@verizon.net> wrote:

> N6KI said "Be sure the one U buy uses an Opt Coupler typr device and not
> descrete transistor(s) - The Optos are far more reliable !!!"
>
> Gee, the 2N398A germanium PNP and the whatever NPN used in the original
> implementation of the "K3KU circuit" for keying pos or neg have been in use
> for over 30 years w/o failure.  They may well pre-date optocouplers AND
> computer keying.
>
> I still have a few 2N398A's if anybody wants to build the circuit, though
> the MPSA92 used by Logikey in their CMOS4 and by MFJ in their 490 would work
> fine. (Note that Logikey and MFJ both use it as a separate neg keying
> output, not the K3KU circuit.)
>
> 73, Art K3KU
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>