To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Another Year of SS Disections |
From: | "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net> |
Reply-to: | sawyered@earthlink.net |
Date: | Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:14:27 -0500 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
It always amazes me. No other contest generates more back and forth and beating dead horses than SS. I think it is just about the only contest some of this group does and then they have a year to talk about it until next year. How do we get through CQ WW, ARRL DX, WPX, and others and never even have a mention about someone's exchange style or mistake? But every year for SS, we all have to comment on this one guy doing x or did you work the guy doing y and how did you log him? Give it a rest guys. See you in CQ WW CW. Ed N1UR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange, Paul O'Kane |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 2008 Sweepstakes log analyzer, Steve Lott |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] NCCC Thursday Night Practice Nov. 21, NS rules, 40/80/160m, Ken Keeler |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Another Year of SS Disections, COOPER, Stewart \(ODL\) |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |