CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange
From: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:17:07 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I think your answer is clear that you will not comply with the rules.

The callsign must be sent in the middle of the exchange. I truly cannot
believe that this point is being argued at all.

You would deserve to be DQed if you did not send your call in the middle of
the exchange.

73,

Bob W5OV

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mike Coslo
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 7:38 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com >> CQ Contest
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange

Robert Naumann wrote:
> There is no requirement to exchange the callsign twice! There is no odd
> "double portion" of the exchange! Where did you get the idea of someone
> getting DQ'ed for it? Sheesh. We need some reality here - please!

Some folk have said that they NIL other Ops who don't send their 
callsign as part of the exchange. That is in addition to the callsign in 
the log. Not me. I support changing the exchange to obviate the silly 
argument.

        - 73 de Mike N3LI -
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>