CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Station not giving a check or section

To: <Paul@ProHomeInspector.net>, "'I H'" <ih772@yahoo.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Station not giving a check or section
From: "Felipe J Hernandez" <fhdez@islandnetjm.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:32:43 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Maybe someone else can confirm that indeed he wasnt giving the whole exchange.
Im sure that opinions from people that really listened to him would be more 
meaningful than mine.

Felipe
NP4Z
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Professional Home Inspections 
  To: 'Felipe J Hernandez' ; 'I H' ; cq-contest@contesting.com 
  Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 9:44 AM
  Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Station not giving a check or section


  I am sure the log checking software does not take into account "good
  intentions"
  Other rare sections stations didn't need to work split when the piles were
  so crazy in order to not be covered by the QRM of the callers and we all had
  to listen for QRP's and VE's. Do you think he was the only station with
  pile-ups?
  He didn't send the required contest exchange correctly, the contacts should
  not count. Period.
  If the ARRL lets this go, guess what will happen next time? 
  The rules state - NO CHECK, NO SECTION = NO QSO.
  If we missed any part of the receiving stations exchange, we told the
  station, NO QSO, please try later. We did not log a partial QSO.

  Paul K2DB @ K2NNY

  -----Original Message-----
  From: Felipe J Hernandez [mailto:fhdez@islandnetjm.com] 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 10:08 AM
  To: I H; cq-contest@contesting.com
  Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Station not giving a check or section

  THere where only 2 or 3 kp4's active.
  I was one of them, I suspect that maybe trying to save time he cut it short,
  the piles were so crazy
  that we had to work split in order not to be covered by the QRM of the
  callers..
  It was difficult since I had to listen for QRP's and VE's to give the
  opportunity to as many guys in all classes.

  If my testimonial helps in any way there was a logical explanation of what
  you heard, Im sure that he gave the rest of the information maybe not all
  the time but Im sure that everyone that worked him got the whole thing
  otherwise the software wouldhave not logged the entry.

  Perhaps the ARRL can understand the good intentions...


  Felipe
  NP4Z



    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: I H 
    To: cq-contest@contesting.com 
    Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 1:32 PM
    Subject: [CQ-Contest] Station not giving a check or section



    During SS phone last weekend I heard a KP4 sending only his serial number
  and precedent. He didn't give a check or section. Will it be counted as a
  valid qso? If it isn't, I wonder how many will miss the sweep because of it.

    There were a lot of guys needing the PR section when he showed up on 20M
  late Sunday afternoon, so the pile up was pretty big. I chose not to try and
  work the guy and took a chance on finding another one later in the contest.
  I got lucky and worked PR with less than a half hour left Sunday evening for
  the sweep.

    So what do you guys think, should it be counted or not?

    Ian - K8MM


          
    _______________________________________________
    CQ-Contest mailing list
    CQ-Contest@contesting.com
    http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

  _______________________________________________
  CQ-Contest mailing list
  CQ-Contest@contesting.com
  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>