| To: | "Leonard J. Umina" <len@brasspounders.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Malicious Interference during SS |
| From: | "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | K0HB <K0HB@ARRL.ORG> |
| Date: | Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:48:03 -0000 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> > The ARRL could go a long way toward fixing this problem by making a > minor change to the rules - if the section is not populated enough to > field at least 5 stations during a contest then it should not be > necessary to work it. > Such a rule would destroy SweepStakes. 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] A thought about contest reporting, Alfred Frugoli |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The contest is over, David Thompson |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] SNS Thursday, Mike Wetzel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Malicious Interference during SS, Paul J. Piercey |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |