Dave,
It's more likely we'll create computers or robots that do the contesting
for us while we watch and tweak their program a bit!
Seriously I am with you on some of this. I'd like to see raw
competition - with hand keys and paper logs. It used to be a lot of fun
in those days and far less hectic. There was a lot to do and it was
hard work. Totals were never really that high but the operating - wow.
We could make SKN a real contest. No keyers or even bugs, just a SK
contest. Then we could have a vibroplex contest - send your SN or
something....
I've recorded several contests but never listened to them, and
ultimately erased them. My intent was to demo contesting, not fix logs
but I might have if I needed to - just never had to. I don't get that
carried away! I do make typos though. Never did when younger. These
days I think W1AEL and type W1ALE. I swear its a Microsoft virus but no
one believes me.
I think its time for a new type of contesting though. We need something
that challenges your computer, internet connection, and operating skills
at the same time. How about a contest where a main server creates QSO
opportunities based on a random selection of stations. It sends you a
hash code, callsign, frequency and minute. You have 1 minute to get the
other stations hash code and load it into your computer and send him
yours. If you do it correctly you get your next QSO assignment. The
computer sends them as fast as you respond - or don't. No more pileups,
and operating skill would really be tested. Perhaps you can tell the
server what antennas you have and what frequencies you can operate.
Packet clusters would not matter.....
One hour after the contest the logs would be available....
Running totals could be on web pages...for the XYL to watch perhaps....
Accuracy would be just as important as speed.....
I love contesting but I don't know how you can define the "spirit of
competition". How much spirit is it for a guy with a $100,000 station
to break a pileup and beat out a guy with a $1000 station - or hundreds
of them. That's like the Enterprise ramming a rowboat to me.
Competition implies equal footing (like all starting from the gate when
the gun fires), and that does not and will not ever exist in ham radio.
Some guys have a QTH on a hill while some use disguise antennas and do
their best. Who wins the "spirit of competition"?
Some guys might have a working computer but no crystal filter and a wide
RX. They make up for that with what they've got - recording and
analysis. Your fancy DSP algorithm is doing the same thing on a shorter
scale and automatically. The very fabric of ham radio is based on a
capitalistic model that fosters creativity. You do the best you can
with the resources you have and you try to make up the difference with
youth, vigor, enthusiasm, technology if you have it, and as much
creativity as you can muster. Luck and propagation help too of course.
I think you have a point, but there are lots of other solutions.
Segmenting scores according to radios, antennas, erp etc might help.
That way there would be winners in each class based on physical tools of
similar capability. I tried to get the ARRL to adopt this proposal
years ago but got no where. It was perhaps too complex to administer
without computers. Might be different today.
/Len
WT6G
-----Original Message-----
From: David Kopacz <david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com>
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] self help during contest
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 18:38:57 -0600
There is a simple answer to your question.
I've said this before, but apparently the phrase "spirit of the competition"
has not fully propagated amongst the group.
The idea behind almost every contest is to see who can "correctly" contact and
log the most stations (points) in the most areas (multipliers).
The idea behind contesting is NOT who can record the most stations. I don't
like the idea of recording contests, nor do I like super check partial
databases or other means of identifying the station worked (i.e. packet
clusters, skimmers).
I don't much care for people operating SO2R being categorized with those using
a single radio.
All of these "tools and techniques" take away from the "spirit of the
competition", which is primarily about making a successful contact with another
station and exchanging some piece of information.
On several occasions, I have tried to work a station, struggled to hear the
call sign correctly and then glanced at the SCP window only to discover that I
could then correctly identify the weak station calling me. It was amazing,
almost magical, how I could suddenly and correctly copy the weak stations call
sign.
Nothing is different with packet cluster. I have seen operators click a call on
the cluster, arrive at the multipliers frequency, barely hear him and call
anyway. Often, we (6Y1V) are strong enough that we actually get through even
though we can only hear the DX multiplier say something like %%1V 59 2%.
Sure, we know the station is DU3EM in zone 27 because the packet cluster in
conjunction with the computer told us so...but we could actually never hear the
full call or exchange through the QRN, QRM, or QSB.
Is this a legitimate contact? Some will say it is. I say it is not. I think
most people will log it. I won't. How can I feel right about logging a contact
I could not completely hear? It reminds me of the old Africa Net I used to
listen to on 21.305 with the old times giving the US operator the call sign of
the DX and asking him to repeat the signal report 15 times until the US station
finally guessed 2 by 2 correctly. Give me a break! Oh, that's next.
I took a long break from contesting only to return to this mess with packet,
computers, databases and skimmers. To top it off, there is the "good ole boys
network" trying to control everyone else.
It seems that as technology advanced, finding ways to have an edge advanced and
for every edge that couldn't be verified by the sponsor, they simply allowed it.
I can't say that I like it what I see. I'm sure some of you agree. Perhaps one
day someone will step up to the plate and create a new radio contest that
doesn't permit all the fancy tools and technology that permit guessing and
revising.
David ~ KY1V
UltraDX.com
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|