That's precisely why most judges in serial number contests allow S/N +/- 1. You
cannot tell who is wrong, so blame neither.
This is a much cleaner and more satisfactory solution to this common problem.
73 de Bob, K6XX
---------- Original Message ----------
From: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
To: <sawyered@earthlink.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Russian DX Contest Log Checking
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:42:05 +0500
This topic had been beaten to death in Russian contest reflector some time
ago. Here is counter argument from that discussion:
N1UR calls CQ
UA9CDC calls N1UR and gives him 599 244
UA9CDC logs QSO but the sent number in his log is 245. The reason for that
can be anything. The op is operating with this software for the first time
and takes serial number from the wrong place on the screen. Or UA9CDC was
multy op station and the software used changed the number after 244 was
sent. So it ended up as 245 in UA9CDC log.
Now how adjudicators have to decide who has to be penalized?
73, Igor UA9CDC
____________________________________________________________
Criminal Lawyers - Click here.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2131/fc/BLSrjnsMx6wGsuJA2JGO4DMFWykKJI3tEySJ7Tp3ODV0qGzkSuTBz8vASMg/
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|