CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Analysis.

To: brian coyne <g4odv@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Analysis.
From: Andrei Stchislenok <asnp3d@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:37:42 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Seems to me that several logs are merged here...

They DO need an Station Inspector during the Contest over there :)

2009/8/22 brian coyne <g4odv@yahoo.co.uk>

>
> I have been looking at some old CQWW CW logs for hints and tips, to
> discover how some of the top guns operate.
>
> In some of them I came across apparantly  glaring anomolies which did not
> accord with my understanding of the M/S rules.
> However after following the thread on here 'Why The 10 min rule anyway'I
> realised that I had it all wrong and it is a case of
> 'if it isn't specifically excluded by the wording of the rules then it's
> ok,' - anything goes.
>
> For a nation which has the highest number of lawyers in the world in it's
> population, probably by numbers as well as per capita, I find it bewildering
> that CQWW Committee cannot come up with a rule which would govern their
> intent!
>
> Be that as it may I will come to the point of this post....
>
> Below is a log extract from a top M/S contender. It covers a period of 4
> minutes and, ignoring the contact in the 32nd minute, records 20 qso's.
> The run freq is 14099, there was one mlt on 21mhz, ignoring that one I make
> that to be 10 frequency changes on 14mhz in that time period. Wow that's
> some going, 5 q's per minute, 10 frq changes, plus a mlt....
> but wait, see how the times jump around? does that mean merged logs, why
> would there need to be merged logs same band, could it be two transmitters
> same band? Well I never!
>
> IMO, and many others too, the M/S has become a joke, merge it with the M/2,
> or change the rules to one transciever and one receiver connected up at one
> time, the spotting station to have no mic or key available.
> At least then the Station Inspector would know what he is looking for,
> strikes me otherwise he has no chance of knowing what is going on, with
> regard to this section of the rules anyway.
>
> All the best,
>
> Brian 5B4AIZ  (C4Z).
>
>
>
>
>
>
> QSO: 14039 CW 200-11-25 1328
> QSO: 14099 CW 200-11-25 1328
> QSO: 14102 CW 200-11-25 1328
> QSO: 14099 CW 200-11-25 1328
> QSO: 14099 CW 200-11-25 1328
> QSO: 14065 CW 200-11-25 1329
> QSO: 14099 CW 200-11-25 1328
> QSO: 14099 CW 200-11-25 1329
> QSO: 14114 CW 200-11-25 1330
> QSO: 14099 CW 200-11-25 1329
> QSO: 14099 CW 200-11-25 1329
> QSO: 14099 CW 200-11-25 1330
> QSO: 21034 CW 200-11-25 1329
> QSO: 14099 CW 200-11-25 1330
> QSO: 14058 CW 200-11-25 1331
> QSO: 14099 CW 200-11-25 1330
> QSO: 14099 CW 200-11-25 1331
> QSO: 14099 CW 2007-11-25 1331
> QSO: 14028 CW 2007-11-25 1332
> QSO: 14099 CW 2007-11-25 1331
> QSO: 14099 CW 2007-11-25 1331
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>



-- 
73's Andrei
EW1AR-NP3D
----------------------------------------------------
DXCC RTTY via LoTW only
Who has what? - World Wide Rating
Please visit: www.k4fo.com/cqrtty/
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>