CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] the "new" M/S for WPX

To: "'Kenneth E. Harker'" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] the "new" M/S for WPX
From: "W7VJ" <w7vj@millerisar.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:16:14 -0800
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Ken:

Thank you for the information.  After reading the basis you kindly provided,
I remain unconvinced.  

As I read this, the difference then is having an imbalance of 3 single op
categories: SOAB, SOAB/assisted and the new M/S, v. having 3 multi-op
categories: the old M/S, M/2, and M/M - ignoring that Single ops can also do
single band entries.  So if this is an imbalance issue, the decision is to
side on more single op categories on the basis that this will promote more
"opportunity" - whatever that means.  

Sorry, despite the benefit of the basis for supporting the change, I remain
unconvinced that there is any factual support for the change.  The comment
regarding the new M/S being analogous to a SOAB/assisted category makes
sense.  That's what this proposes, whether the assistance is electronic or
human, or both.

Andrew
W7VJ
  
   






-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth E. Harker [mailto:kenharker@kenharker.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 6:45 PM
To: W7VJ
Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] the "new" M/S for WPX

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 06:14:27PM -0800, W7VJ wrote:
> 
> One of the comments made was along the lines of "if it ain't broke, don't
> fix it."  Randy justifies the basis for the change as "The new rules will
> establish a true single-transmitter category that is limited to 8 band
> changes per hour."  I cannot help wonder why is this necessary?  What
> conditions have suggested the need for a change.  Perhaps if CQ can
explain
> why the change is needed, I might be more inclined to support it.  

Randy recently discussed this in depth in the CQ WPX blog:

http://www.cqwpx.com/blog/?p=46

"The WPX Committee is carefully considering a change to the Multi-Single 
category rules for 2010. We believe that the addition of the Multi-Two 
category several years ago has created an imbalance.  There are essentially 
three multi-transmitter categories! There is currently no place for a 
station with only one radio to compete.  Almost any top level Multi-Single 
station can easily step up to the Multi-Two category. This gives us the 
opportunity to make an adjustment in the rules to create more opportunity 
for more stations."

You can also search the archives of CQ-Contest and find a lot of
collective sould searching about the M/S category in WPX through the 
years.  

-- 
Kenneth E. Harker WM5R
kenharker@kenharker.com
http://www.kenharker.com/
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>