CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Strong access control to Skimmer

To: Luc PY8AZT <py8azt@dxbrasil.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Strong access control to Skimmer
From: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Reply-to: n4zr@contesting.com
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:11:03 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Because it does not accept spots, nor is it connected to anywhere else.

73, Pete N4ZR

The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at www.conteststations.com
The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at 
reversebeacon.blogspot.com


On 4/19/2010 8:44 AM, Luc PY8AZT wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm monitoring DXCluster Skimmer based via Telnet connection for
> while. It's absurd how this technology is amazing. It frenetically
> sniffs calls on the bands, nothig scape from Skimmer.
>
> We had discussed here the needing to turn DXCluster more safe by
> password access control. As this is a starting point to a new concept
> of relationship with spot network, it would be natural to apply strong
> access control to DXCluster Skimmer based to prevent someone use this
> hiden.
>
> We really need to know who is and where is everyone logged into
> Skimmer Telnet node during competitions.
>
> Why this Skimmer telnet node doesn't have strong access control to log in?
>
>    
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>