CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Blind Mode for N1MM Bandmap

To: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>, "CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Blind Mode for N1MM Bandmap
From: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Reply-to: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:36:34 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Having used a bandscope on my transceivers during the past 15 years, I can 
tell the difference between CW, RTTY, and SSB just by looking at the scope.

73 de Bob - KØRC in MN


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
To: "CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 3:25 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Blind Mode for N1MM Bandmap


> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 05:59:06PM -0000, Radio K0HB wrote:
>> If the information displayed to the operator simply indicates that "there 
>> is
>> a signal spotted at 14.005MHz" without any filtering for identification,
>> dupe, new mult, etc., then it is no more informative than a band scope, 
>> and
>> it should NOT constitute "assistance" in the commonly accepted sense.
>
> But, it does tell you more than a band scope.  If it's been decoded as a 
> CW
> signalbut just anonymized, then you at least know it's not RTTY or SSB, 
> which
> might be useful information in certain segments of the band, especially on
> 40 meters.  I suppose a bandscope built into a radio might someday be able
> to make that same determination, but I don't know of any right now that 
> do.
>
> -- 
> Kenneth E. Harker WM5R
> kenharker@kenharker.com
> http://www.kenharker.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>