CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest consistency

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest consistency
From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 07:54:53 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I am curious as to why this is thought of as Meaningless?

Honestly,

Joe WB9SBD

The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com

On 11/10/2010 5:57 AM, KC4HW wrote:
> On 10 Nov 2010 at 9:14, Maarten van Rossum wrote:
>
>> I'm pretty
>> sure that these "meaningless debates" will keep on going for quite a
>> while.
> No truer words have been spoken!
>
> Jim/KC4HW
> http://www.AlabamaContestGroup.org
> http://www.AlabamaQSOParty.org
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>