CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Omitting callsigns in exchanges

To: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Omitting callsigns in exchanges
From: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:53:00 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

On 11/10/2010 1:27 PM, Joseph Giasi wrote:
>
> Instead of requiring that one's own callsign be part of the exchange, how
> about a change in the rules to require that the exchange include the
> callsign of the previous station worked (send your own callsign only for QSO
> serial #1)? Then, it could not be omitted. Having a callsign of neither of
> the current operators in the exchange would add additional "randomness" that
> would certainly test an operator's skill. Also, we would not have this
> debate again. Just a thought.
>
>
>
> Joe - W2QQ
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
The rules aren't broken, so why "fix" them?  Only some ignorant or 
smart-a** ops are.
Barry W2UP

--
  

Barry Kutner, W2UP             Lakewood, CO

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>