CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] ZEROLAND QSO PARTY

To: "VE5ZX" <ve5zx@hotmail.com>, "Joe" <nss@mwt.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ZEROLAND QSO PARTY
From: "Richard F DiDonna NN3W" <richnn3w@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 18:03:27 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
There should not, should not, should not be any contest activity on the WARC 
bands.

73 Rich NN3W

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "VE5ZX" <ve5zx@hotmail.com>
To: "Joe" <nss@mwt.net>; <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 12:48 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ZEROLAND QSO PARTY


> Joe,
>
> Apparently there is a gentleman's agreement according to this WIKI entry (
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WARC_bands ) which says "Due to their
> relatively small bandwidth of 100 kHz or less, there is a sort of
> gentlemen's agreement that the WARC bands may not be used for general
> contesting." Maybe some one can clarify this fact.
>
> In these rules which I think are official
> http://www.zerolandqsoparty.com/
> it says "160, 80, 40, 20, 15, and 10 meters only." WARC bands are not
> allowed.
>
> Yet in these rules in the QRZ forums
> http://forums.qrz.com/showthread.php?t=271653
> it says "Bands: 160, 80, 40, 20,15, and 10 plus QSOs on WARC bands & 50MHz
> by schedule. See Bonus section"
>
> Maybe some one can clarify which rules are the right ones. Hope there 
> later
> posting is wrong It would be a shame to see contest intrusion on the WARC
> bands even for a single Q. It is not in the spirit of contesting and the 
> use
> of WARC bands.
>
> Syl -VE5ZX
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>