CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: [SOU] => Single-op Unassisted <sort of long>

To: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: [SOU] => Single-op Unassisted <sort of long>
From: Glenn Wyant <va3dx@sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 08:52:47 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Operating aids that would help me make more qsos....

A dog walker
Someone who would prepare dinner and bring it to me
Servant to bring coffee / tea whenever
A shack washroom
A working telephone screening system , especially against telemarketeers
A time machine to make younger
etc etc

VA3DX

> I am sure that someone could find the right words to add to the VE3EJ
> definition so that operator generated [not technology at the station
> generated] calls and frequencies could populate the BAND MAP and it could
> remain an accepted "operating aid".
>
>
>
> I believe that there may be a sincere group of people who would like to 
> see
> SOU evolve to allow a higher QSO rate than might be possible for a
> particular operators without additions to the currently permitted set of
> "operating aids".
>
> If we want to preserve the classification of SOU it is worth taking the 
> time
> to develop a set of "operating aids" that are permitted and then exclude 
> all
> others until such a time as there is clear need or overwhelming interest 
> in
> adding an additional "operating aid".

K0TO 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>