CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: [SOU] => Single-op Unassisted <sort of long>

To: "'Bob Naumann'" <W5OV@W5OV.COM>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: [SOU] => Single-op Unassisted <sort of long>
From: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 09:10:38 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Bob:

I agree with your assessment of the BAND MAP function being quite acceptable
if the calls are placed there by the actual operator. My concern was that
VE3EJ's rules might be construed as not permitting that which I believe
would not be a correct limitation.

Tod, K0TO

> 
> Your description of the bandmap as a potential issue misses 
> the point as the
> bandmap capability does not provide the callsigns and 
> frequencies to the
> unassisted operator unless he has decoded the callsigns 
> himself and placed
> them in the bandmap for future reference.  The key to 
> understanding this is
> that the operator must receive and decode all callsigns 
> himself - no other
> assistance in this whether biological or silicon-based should 
> be permitted.
> 
> 73,
> 
> Bob W5OV

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>