CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules
From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 09:32:04 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
True I knew a totally deaf operator.  He used two methods to copy code.  
one was a blinking light, it worked he'd say  but he liked a vibrating 
pad better where like a cell phone in buzz mode it vibrated and he just 
touched  his finger to it to copy.  he was pretty good too average 25 
wpm or so.

Joe WB9SBD

The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com

On 1/4/2011 6:42 AM, David Robbins wrote:
> inadequate and not politically correct... you need a better definition that 
> accounts for those who are either physically or mentally unable to copy by 
> ear, or by eye, or by typing what they can see or hear.
>
>
> Jan 3, 2011 09:06:57 PM, w4pa@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> W5OV:
>
>> The focus instead should be "what are the characteristics of an unassisted
>> single op"?
> Ear, not eye.
>
> Scott
> W4PA
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>