CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules
From: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 18:48:03 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 05/01/2011 14:19, Bob Naumann wrote:

> I would also propose that we not focus on the word "assisted". I think that
> word at the time it was selected was certainly not chosen to cover whatever
> might develop over the coming decades.

Agreed - all relevant technology assists.  Computer
loggers assist, SCP assists ....

> 1) Single Operator
> 2) Single Operator Plus
> 3) Single Operator Extreme

I suggest

1)  Single Operator SO
2)  Single Operator Hybrid SOH (uses other comms
            technologies or multi-channel decoders)

I don't see any reason to have a third category
of single-op, athough some may argue for a multi-op
extreme category.

A definition like this offers the possibility
of introducing a multi-op "unassisted" category,
for teams preferring not to use other communications
technologies or multi-channel decoders.

73,
Paul EI5DI










_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>