On 05/01/2011 14:19, Bob Naumann wrote:
> I would also propose that we not focus on the word "assisted". I think that
> word at the time it was selected was certainly not chosen to cover whatever
> might develop over the coming decades.
Agreed - all relevant technology assists. Computer
loggers assist, SCP assists ....
> 1) Single Operator
> 2) Single Operator Plus
> 3) Single Operator Extreme
I suggest
1) Single Operator SO
2) Single Operator Hybrid SOH (uses other comms
technologies or multi-channel decoders)
I don't see any reason to have a third category
of single-op, athough some may argue for a multi-op
extreme category.
A definition like this offers the possibility
of introducing a multi-op "unassisted" category,
for teams preferring not to use other communications
technologies or multi-channel decoders.
73,
Paul EI5DI
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|