CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED -- was: =>RE: Chea

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED -- was: =>RE: Chea
From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 10:40:36 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I never understand why this is always soo hard.

Assisted,
Another person or machine OUTSIDE your station helped you make or find 
contacts.

Machine INSIDE your station is just that station equipment Not assisted.

Person INSIDE your station helps you is also not called Assisted,  but 
it IS called MULTIOP

Joe WB9SBD

The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com

On 9/26/2011 4:54 AM, Marijan Miletic, S56A wrote:
> EI5DI wrote: To this I say that anyone who needs a CW decoder has no
> business being in a CW contest - because they don't know CW.
>
> I don't know Baudot code so I used PC decoder this fabulous CQ WW RTTY
> weekend.  I built DH1TW type SDR IF adapter in my FT-1000MP in order to
> "see" 20 kHz bandwidth.  I also wrote my own program to decode all RTTY
> callsigns within BUT if I use it, I am "assisted".  By whom?
>
> I feel digitally "restricted" without Extreme class :-(  This is NOT good
> for the best scientific hobby of 21st century as advertised by IARU.
>
> 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>