| To: | "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Kenwood TS-590S Contesting performance question |
| From: | BRYON PAUL n0ah VEAL <bryonveal@msn.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:18:13 -0600 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I have heard from a few contesters that the RX performance of the TS-590S is
excellent for the money, and very comparable to radios in a higher $$$ class.
We have an Icom Pro IIII. For low band CW DX and contesting, does anyone have
an opinion which of these two different radios are better performers?
Especially for 80/160M. Feel free to reply to n0ah@arrl.net.
73-
Bryon "Paul" Veal MAED
FCC Amateur Radio License-N0AH
n0ah@arrl.net
Certified ARRL Volunteer Wireless Technology Instructor
Acres Green Elementary School Amateur Radio Club Trustee - KD0NIV
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED -- was: =>RE: Chea, Joe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] California QSO Party: Webinar Tuesday, John Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] WAEDC SSB 2011 - Final call for logs, DL8WPX |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Kenwood TS-590S Contesting performance question, BRYON PAUL n0ah VEAL |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |