Graham,
There are methods to do this, but it is not likely that the contest
sponsor will provide specific details of how this is done as it would
offer hints on how to get around it.
Suffice it to say that several data sources are used including the other
logs that are submitted to reach the conclusion that a single operator is
assisted.
As you have seen in the recent summaries of the CQWW contests, many
stations have been cited for this and convicted of same. Many stations
submitted the logs without indicating that they were assisted, but as
reported in the results, this was a clerical error rather than a blatant
cheating activity.
73,
Bob W5OV
> Thanks to all who have offered their points of view on my query.
>
> The discussion has been interesting and makes it clear that for some there
> is confusion on just what the distinction between ASSISTED and
> NON-ASSISTED really is. I suspect due in part to the wording used in the
> contest rules.
>
> Still not answered however was the methodology used by contest organizers
> on how the determination is made, based on a submitted log alone, as to
> their changing an entry from NON-ASSISTED to ASSISTED.
>
> It was suggested that my thoughts were that these two categorizations are
> "too close" and separated by a very thin ill defined and increasingly grey
> line. That is quite true.
>
> The categorization of the number of operators at a station is quite clear
> - one operator (SINGLE OP) or more than one operator (MULTI OP). Single OP
> ASSISTED just ads a layer between the two that is somewhat more than
> SINGLE OP but not quite MULTI OP.
>
> Perhaps the day has come and gone where the distinction between ASSISTED
> vs NON-ASSISTED had some value. Trouble is, we are creatures of habit and
> changes come slow and painful. We continue to do things the way we always
> have simply because that is the way we have always have done those things.
>
> Keep these categories if you wish but better define the distinction
> between the two.
>
> In the meantime, I am still searching for the answer to my original
> philosophical query - How does an interested third party (contest
> organizer) determine that a SINGLEOP NON-ASSISTED entry really should be
> categorized as ASSISTED through the analysis of a log post contest?
>
> Cheers, Graham ve3gtc
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|