CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED -- was: =>RE:Chea

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED -- was: =>RE:Chea
From: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:27:56 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
W5OV wrote: You have to have both locating AND identifying components 
performed by the operator.

Hams seem to be adicted to slow VFO knob rotation while they happily use SCP 
identifying!  Even n+1 versions.

I accept arguments of assisted being public help from others.  CW Skimmer 
and my CW Expert / RTTY robot are just technology developments with 20 years 
lag.

My latest work with YT7PWR help is published at 
http://code.google.com/p/cw-expert/downloads/list  Still hoping for W1VE 
professional help!

Photo of today's RTTY bandmap from Sunday 20 m CQ WW RTTY recording is added 
on my Facebook page  25 callsings in 11 minutes within 9 kHz..

73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED -- was: =>RE:Chea, Marijan Miletic, S56A <=