[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] To cut or not to cut?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] To cut or not to cut?
From: Ktfrog007@aol.com
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 13:00:30 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
The most egregious misuse of cut numbers I've ever heard was by 4T100MP in  
2011. Some ops there sent 4T1TTMP as their call sign. No kidding.
I always find cut numbers to be a problem. Europeans use  them more than 
anyone else. I didn't know about N1MM's conversion of a cut  number to the 
real McCoy. I'll learn to use that feature. There are many  mysteries of N1MM.
Also, I quit sending leading zeros about 2 hours into the WPX this  year.  
Just decided it was a bad practice. Never again.  For zeros  which are part 
of the number, I send a zero.
Kermit, AB1J
In a message dated 5/31/2012 2:59:27 P.M. GMT Standard Time,  
ve5zx@hotmail.com writes:

During  the WPX CW while condx here were good on 15m they were not great. 
Many low  power EU signals were marginal. I noticed that I asked for more 
repeats  from EU stations that were using  cut number than from those that  
were not using them. I recall thinking that if the full number was sent  
instead of cut number the request for repeats might have been  lower.

Syl -  VE5ZX

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>