Paul O'Kane wrote:
>> This is yet another reason that we chose to focus on the information
>> provided by the technology, not the technology itself.
>
> I believe this approach is flawed because the focus
> is on the end result, and it disregards the means,
> no matter how inappropriate, by which the result is
> achieved.
Thing is, the means by which a given end result may be accomplished are many.
Radio amateurs are an inventive bunch. If one means is (are?) outlawed, we
will find another means. You'll end up playing "whack-a-mole" -- and
you'll end up with a set of contest rules larger than the International Call
Book.
Personally, I thought the principles Dick posted made an enormous amount of
sense.
--
Doug Smith W9WI
Pleasant View, TN EM66
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|