I wasn't on this weekend, but I have a tendency to give these stations a
call and if they work me without giving me their call I can't log them.
Oops sorry they lose the Q. If everyone would do this maybe they would get
the idea. I don't spend a lot of time at it, but if they are loud and
workable but they don't ID while I am there, they do not go in MY log. If I
am in theirs, well that can't be helped. I don't lose any points.
Jim K0XU Sent from my Xoom tablet
On Jul 30, 2012 7:03 AM, "Stewart GM4AFF" <stewart@gm4aff.net> wrote:
> Mats, you have pretty much just said word-for-word what I said in my 3830
> post! And I don't think we're alone - I know of 2 others who said this. As
> well as the poor operating style, I wonder how so many people can call a
> station who only ID's every 15 QSOs how they know his call. It made the 12
> hr mixed UNASSISTED section very frustrating. I tuned past many stations
> who
> didn't ID after 2 or 3 Q's.
> 73
> Stewart
> GM4AFF (GM3F)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mats Strandberg
> Sent: 29 July 2012 17:43
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Do I need to operate assisted to figure out the
> calls?
>
> During the IOTA Contest I realized that some stations have become so
> self-assured that everyone checks the cluster, so the need to ID after
> contacts has become useless.
>
> Come on guys, there are still a few operators around the globe who actually
> want to copy the call themselves and not rely on cluster spots.
>
> Amazingly poor behavior from many stations on the band this weekend!
>
> Do I need to work Assisted next time instead of waiting 12-15 QSO before
> someone ID?
>
> I work acceptably high rates myself but ID at least every second or third
> QSO even if the pile is huge. If just one station was calling the last
> time,
> I ID after each QSO.
>
> Time to teach some of the newbies how to do it - as well as re-teach old
> guns how we used to do it before the appearance of the cluster?
>
> 73 de RM2D (ex. RA/SM6LRR), Mats
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2437/5163 - Release Date: 07/29/12
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|