To: | "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Summarizing the Skimmer Accuracy Thread |
From: | Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org> |
Date: | Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:09:05 -0500 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:13 PM, <w5ov@w5ov.com> wrote: > > If the 20 EK1LZ spots were the only errors, that would not be so bad - I > guess... but that's not the case. > It's probably worth noting that in all 20 cases, the EK1LZ spots appear to have been unique, coming from only one skimmer. (Different skimmers at different times, but only one at a time.) -- *Michael D. Adams* (N1EN) Poquonock, Connecticut | mda@n1en.org _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] World Mobile Congress in Barcelona Spain, Felipe J. Hernández |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Amazing discovery re CW, Charles Harpole |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Summarizing the Skimmer Accuracy Thread, w5ov |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Summarizing the Skimmer Accuracy Thread, Guy Olinger K2AV |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |