I generally agree with the sentiments of Bob, W5OV, but think he missed the
boat when he said
“The reason CHECKLOGs should be accepted late is because the deadline is not
only to "speed up the log checking process" - it's also and perhaps more
importantly, to limit the amount of time for post-contest log
manipulations/shenanigans.” The real problem with all the discussed rules and
changes is that it appears that no one bothered to define the goals that they
were trying to achieve with the rules/changes. As quoted above, the five day
rule is a joke. Yes, it gets logs in early to get the process rolling, but one
can just as easily massage a log in 24 hours or five days as he can in 30 days,
he just does it sooner. The rule does not advance the goal. If your goal is to
get unmassaged logs, then they should be sent in immediately after the
contest—30 minutes at most. If an operator is in a location where he can’t
get it in in that time period, then he should explain the reason for more time
and the log checkers should give that log special attention.
As for assisted versus non assisted, what is your goal for even asking the
merger question? If you haven’t got a goal then why ask. If you have a goal
then tell us so we can examine the proposition in light of the goal. Is it to
stop cheating? Is it to make log checking easier? Are we changing the rules
of the game to make the umpires' jobs easier? Why do you ask the questions?
There are a lot of reasons people choose different categories. I don’t have
the equipment to operate SO2R, and SO2R is essential to be competitive in SOAB
assisted or not. Sometimes I get in a contest just to maximize points for the
local club, and that usually means I operate assisted. When I want to really
compete, I know I can’t do it all band without SO2R, so I go single band where
SO2R has a much less advantage. Why haven’t the contest sponsors asked the
question if SO2R should be a separate category? Perhaps because they just
don’t want to. Yeah, it’s been beaten to death on the reflectors, but a survey
has never been taken. That question would seem to be of more interest than the
assisted versus unassisted merger question?
What about guest operators? If a guest operator can keep operating while the
“host” goes outside to fix a broken antenna or rotator, why is that single
operator? Why not a survey question?
It seems that there are a lot of more interesting questions than merging
assisted and unassisted. 73 Saul K2XA
Visit DHSES online at: www.dhses.ny.gov
Visit NY-ALERT online at: www.nyalert.gov
This e-mail was sent from email servers at the Division of Homeland Security &
Emergency Services(DHSES). Its contents, including any attachments, are
intended only for the individual(s) named. If you received this e-mail in
error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, do not
disseminate, copy or otherwise use it or its attachments.
Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this e-mail
from your system.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|