CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Can Reverse Beacon Network skimmers get overloaded?

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Can Reverse Beacon Network skimmers get overloaded?
From: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 11:14:45 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
N4ZR wrote: to the best of my knowledge there is no such "desensing"
phenomenon with CW Skimmer or Skimmer Server.

 

There is well known natural phenomena in discrete digital signal analysis of
spectral overlaps.  CW is modulated by keying or even worse with cliks.
Sidebands take some bandwidth before disappearing bellow HF noise level.  It
might be almost imposible to detect weak signal amongst two strong ones.  

 

RBN helps as unfiltered spots give a good worldwide bandmap.  Find the
bigest empty hole there and call CQ.  Real time propagation state should be
shown immediately.  I had few totally quiet periods last WPX weekend with
100 W and CQ S56A S56A TEST!

 

LP MMM S56A

 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>