HB9CVQ wrote: 2. April 2012, 03:08 / 0319 Z on 14006 and 14056 kHz while I
was really on 1821 kHz Cqing with better than 60 dB measured harmonics
suppression.
Ex-VR2BG/p wrote: That has nothing to do with what we had discussed - how
skimmers report stations on frequencies - even bands - they are not on.
HB9CVQ used 1 kW on 160 m with 2 x 36 m doublet. S50ARX uses QS1R with
similar doublet on the top of the hill. HB9CVQ was certainly strong at
S50ARX almost as at K1TTT with 84 dB S/N - HI. All that was required to
translate HB9CVQ from 160 m was strong BC somewhere around 12 or 16 MHz.
IMD products were just 10 dB above dead 20 m band noise. Ocassional CW
Skimmer errors occur on harmonically related frequencies.
There seem to be people obsessed by intentional QRM. My callsign was badly
abused once causing DX-ped interference. I only operate weekend contests
using barefoot FT-1000MP or TS-480. I mainly notice bad ham signals and
Asian OTHR. Ionosphere is fun especially after Radio Peking and Woodpecker.
LP MMM S56A, N1YU
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|