CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] : Reverse beacon of my own call?

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] : Reverse beacon of my own call?
From: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@Earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 13:21:08 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I guess Ron and others missed this line in my last post.  It is repeated
here:

 

"The rules should be written as "Don't use RBN for any purpose" if that is
the point of the rule."

 

If the intent is actually as some are broadly interpreting it, it should be
removed from the sub heading of "QSO alerting assistance" and be a
"prohibited use of technology for any use" in the assisted vs non-assisted
definition.  

 

How can you possibly argue with that.

 

Ed  N1UR

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>