CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Ethics of operating overtime in SS

To: "Michael Prevatt" <bpd315@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Ethics of operating overtime in SS
From: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
The contest sponsor has already stated that Q's after 24 hours are not scored, 
but there is no other penalty.  




There also is no penalty if your check is different that it was 







On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:58, Michael Prevatt 
<bpd315@gmail.com="mailto:bpd315@gmail.com";>> wrote:

I bet the first station dq'd for running over 24 hrs would be a bold move and 
statement of intent. Drastic, in my opinion, but bold. 


Respectfully, mike ku4yp.  


Sent from my iPhone


> On Oct 29, 2013, at 12:14 PM, Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net> wrote:

> 

> It sounds like some members of the reflector are concerned that the current 
> wording of the rules, and the current implementation of the rules, don't 
> match.

> 

> If that is the case, then one of three things must be done:

> (a)  Enforce the rules as written

> (b)  Update the wording of the rules to reflect the current implementation.

> (c)  Ignore the armchair lawyers and continue to do what is being done.

> 

> Clearly (c) is bothering a lot of people.  Personally, if asked, I'd go with 
> (b).  Not that anyone asked my opinion...

> ,
> 73

> next year.


73, de Hans, K0NB
> 

> _______________________________________________

> CQ-Contest mailing list

> CQ-Contest@contesting.com

> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________

CQ-Contest mailing list

CQ-Contest@contesting.com

http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>